Assessment of the War on Terror Essay

The necessity and the non-necessity of wars in the course of valet history and societal multifariousness whitethorn be seen from two diametrically opposing views. On the star hand, it is considered necessary in the sense similar to Adolf Hitlers stance on war and its critical function in the evolution of man and society. In his work entitled Mein Kampf, he writes, Mankind has grown strong in eternal struggles and it will only perish through eternal ataraxis (1943, p. 45). On the other hand, pacifist thinkers such as Mahatma Gandhi do non assent to the idea that wars are necessary. On the contrary, his notion of civil disobedience is founded on the principle of ahimsa, that is, total non-violence.The Gulf fights, a term shortly used to refer to the series of wars which occurred in the past two decades with its shutting in what is popularly known as the unify States of Americas Invasion of Iraq in 2003.The striking fact though is that the different honorable convictions of th e people is made manifest even in their choice of address to refer to the aforementioned Invasion of Iraq. Invasion is a derogatory word. The fancy of invasion assumes the existence of a hostile party who will endeavor turmoil and havoc within another territory. However, for those who assent to the Bush administration, the fitting term is not invasion but rather, liberation. As opposed to invasion, the concept of liberation assumes the renewal of a repressed freedom.These insights point aside that human social reality is held fast by systems of power and power relations, near especially in the context of international politics and a globalized, capital-driven economy. globalization is indeed, the current paradigm. This papers task involves an evaluation of the political motivations that screwing justify the necessity of war.One may perceive the current United States War on terror in two ways. First, one may perceive it as an appeal to the Messianic aspect of man in terms of which man enables the liberation of his neighbor from conditions that restrict his freedom. Second, one may view it as a domains plight for constant economic growth thereby sacrificing the life of the few and the interests of other nations for the procural of its own interests. It is important to note that Bush Administrations War on Terrorism can be summed as a countrys plight for economic power at the expense of the inception of the few. If such is the case, the aforementioned war does not thereby pose to the main propositions of what may considered, as a just war, which states that the use of describe out by one nation against the other, is always wrong unless the latter has forgo its prefatorial rights (Lackey 222). It is important to note that in order for basic rights to be forfeited, it is necessary that the other state has already used force in violation of the basic rights of other states or it has threatened to use force in violation of the basic rights of other st ates and made preparations to carry out their threat (Lackey 229).Another instance wherein a state has forfeited its basic rights is apparent during instances wherein its ability to govern is disrupted by a secessionist reason which is representative in character or when the state in heading has engaged in massive violations of basic personal rights (Lackey 229). These conditions, however, were not initially met by Iran before the aforementioned War on Terror.ReferencesHitler, Adolf (1943). Mien Kampf. Trans. Ralf Manheim. capital of the United Kingdom Houghton Mifflin.Lackey, Douglas. The Ethics of War and Peace.