Aristotle’s Politics - The Good Man Should Not Rule the City Essay

Aristotles authorities - The Good Man Should Not Rule the CityAristotle contends that the unassailable adult male is dissimilar to the erect citizen in ways he goes a colossal length to illustrate. He distinguishes the two for the purpose of facilitating his later argu ments concerning the appropriate apportioning of sovereignty to the rightful ruler, who he subsequently claims is the good homo who excels whole others in each and every aspect. Aristotles distinction further prompts the notion that he advocates a monarchial form of constitution, for the rule of a single good humanness is equivalent to a constitution of kingship. This can be derived through the avocation reasoning. Aristotle is convinced that the good citizen can so be defined plainly in relation to the constitution he is an element of The excellence of the citizen essential be an excellence relative to the constitution (1276b16). The good man on the other hand, is a man so called in virtue of a single ab solute excellence (1276b16). He further asserts that the good citizen must get the knowledge and capa city requisite for reigning as well as for being ruleda good man will to a fault need both (1277b71277b16). From these conclusions of Aristotle, it is evident that the good man and the good citizen differ in the manner of their excellence, but not in their capacity for ruling or being ruled. It should therefore follow that there should not hold out impediments to the ruling by the good citizen in the city as contradictory to the ruling by the good man due to the fact that they atomic number 18 identical in their competence to rule. However, Aristotle in his later arguments, crowns the good man as ruler in the best constitutionthere is someone of superior excellence. What is to be done in that case? Nobody wou... ...scussed). The justification of the good man in becoming the supreme educator can be made in the following way. Since all absolutely excellent men (good men) arriv e at their excellence through the process of education, that is, they ar not innately excellent, their efforts should be directed toward the emulation of their excellence in the children of the city, for they are the ones who know best the process of becoming excellent. In this manner of education, the children (being afterlife citizens) will grow up to become good men and good citizens, and thus the future city will comprise of many potential drop rulers. The good man through education, will contribute towards the ruling of the city indirectly in such an instance, and not directly as Aristotle claims he should do. Works CitedAristotle. Poetics. Trans. Gerald F. Else. Ann Arbor Ann Arbor Paperbacks, 1990.